Some violent protesters allegedly torched police cars parked on the highway on Sunday. One of India's largest private universities, Lovely Professional University (LPU), has suspended classes after an unverified allegation that a female student was raped on campus set off protests that descended into violence.
Allegations and Initial Response
Police say they have registered a case and are trying to verify whether last week's alleged rape at LPU occurred. The university has categorically denied the allegation. According to police, no student has come forward to say she was assaulted, and investigators have yet to identify the alleged victim or the perpetrator. CCTV footage examined so far has yielded no evidence of an attack.
However, rumours circulating on student WhatsApp groups led to unrest over the weekend at the sprawling 600-acre university in Punjab, which draws students from India and abroad. Founded in 2005 by a family whose business began with a small sweet shop, LPU has grown into a largely self-contained world of hostels and lecture halls, with thousands of young people living on campus.
Protests Escalate
Images and videos showed vehicles in flames, crowds filling a major highway, and police wielding canes as unrest spilled beyond the university gates. Police vehicles were damaged, officers injured, and parts of the campus were vandalised. By Monday, the highway had reopened, and the campus was calmer but heavily policed.
University authorities described the claims circulating on social media as false and baseless, but it did little to reassure students, with hostels emptying within hours. Key exams were postponed, and students were allowed to go home.
Following demands from protesting students, police registered a rape case against "an unidentified person" and formed a seven-member special investigation team (SIT) to investigate.
Timeline of Events
The unrest began in the early hours of September 27, when word spread that a female student had been raped in or near one of the university's hostels a few days earlier. The suspect was variously described by students and in media reports as a plumber, painter, or construction worker. Some students claimed the assault had occurred on September 23 and accused the university of failing to act after being informed.











